Please help me to understand the difference between TROIZ/TROLZ tables against V_TROLZ00, V_TROLZ01 and V_TROLZ02 tables. I am preparing a Route Determination conversion Functional Spec. I am not sure which tables/fields to be mentioned for mapping. The client needs the route determination data to be loaded for Order and Delivery.
Please help. Thanks
Is it possible to limit Yard scenario just to checking in and checking out?
We want to manage arrivals and departures of vehicles in factory with out using loading steps.
Hi Experts
We have defined id point for storage type , say , B01. The Id point is 011 storage type.
At the time of Goods Receipts in B01 , the Storage unit receipts are first done at ID Point 011
and from there we have to create another TO to putaway to final destination B01 in the warehouse.
As per id point concept this looks ok.
But when I want to move Storage unit from one storage type (say B05) to Storaeg Type (B01) using LT09 or LT10 , the destination being B01 (with id point 011), the system creates TO on id point 011 , which is not desired. How can we avoid this Id point route for internal transfers and keep it for GR receipts only ?
Thanks in advance ,
Regards / Vinod
Hello experts,
I have a question regarding the automatic creation of an inbound delivery.
We are transferring goods from one warehouse to another in the same plant via a stock transfer order (UB).
In this stock transfer order the confirmation key is Y004.
In table V_T163L the 'v' is set under inbound delivery creation. So that looks OK.
However it is not created upon save of the PO.
Can you help maybe?
Thanks!
Dear All
I create process order and evecute WM material staging Error message
IMG set related
Logistics Execution > Warehouse Management > Interfaces > Define Production
Production Supply Area
Replenishment Movement Type
Control Material Staging
Production View
Whse Management View
Whse Management View
Tcode LPK2
if my set has errors, please teach me how to set
Dear Gurus,
I'm having troubles here, first of all, i've done the whole configuration for opportunistic cross docking. When i create putaway tasks for products, it's working fine, but when i try to create a putaway task for a packed inbound delivery it doesn't work in other words when i try to create the putaway task for the HU it doesn't work.
Am I figuring it wrong or the inbound driven opportunistic cross docking only works with product tasks ( warehouse request tasks )?
Besides of these process tests, i have debbuged ( i'm an ABAP too ) the whole process and have discovered that the function module /SCWM/TO_PREP_WHR_UI_INT ( which is called by /SCWM/PRDI to create the tasks ) doesn't has the structure of cross docking for HU tasks. Code below....
IF NOT lt_prepare_hu_int IS INITIAL.
* Prepare putaway TO for HU
PERFORM prepare_hu_to USING iv_lgnum
iv_mode
iv_squit
iv_bname
iv_wtcode
iv_filter_hu
is_param
iv_process
lt_prepare_hu_int
CHANGING et_ltap_vb.
ENDIF.
IF NOT lt_prepare_whr_int IS INITIAL.
* Prepare putaway/pick TO for warehouse request
PERFORM prepare_whr_to USING iv_lgnum
iv_process
iv_mode
iv_mve_mat
iv_mve_hu
iv_mve_hu_mult
iv_route_crea_prod_lb
iv_squit
iv_full_pick
iv_bname
iv_wtcode
iv_wave_release
lt_prepare_hu_int
CHANGING lt_prepare_whr_int
et_doc
et_ltap_vb
et_whr_items_cd.
et_open_qty = gt_whr_open_qty.
ENDIF.
Am i missing something here? Could someone help me with this please?!
Regards,
Rafael Valim
Dear SAP experts,
We have requirements where we need to have packing proposals for items. SAP does have this functionality, but the requirement is a bit unique in which one part can have different packing instruction in one delivery.
Eg. 1 pc of kit has:
3 pc part A
4 pc part B
1 pc part C
1 pc part D
2 pc part E
it should be packed like this:
package 1:
1 pc part A
2 pc part E
package 2:
1 pc part B
1 pc part C
1 pc part D
package 3:
2 pc part A
3 pc part B
If package 1, 2, 3 is translated into packing instruction, part A will appear in packing instruction for 1, and 3. Part B in 2, and 3 and so on. After debugging how SAP determine the packing instruction, it seems using regular condition technique, this requirement cannot be fulfilled. However we interested to see that in FM VHUPIHU_FIND_AND_RESOL_GENERAL, there is one sub-routine called user_exit_chg_prototypes_all. This sub-routine doesnt contain any code, but there is a remark '* in this form customer can change all created prototype HUs". So we assume that whatever packing instruction proposed by SAP can be broken in here and then re-built using any logic that we have. Sounds promising but there is no documentation how we use this sub-routine (what can be changed, and the guideline to change).
Does someone has experience using this sub-routine? Appreciate if someone can share their experience using this sub-routine.
Best regards,
John
Im trying to use standard radio frequency transaction for <u>Putaway by TO</u> (LM03 *) to change the destination bin for a single-step confirmation TO during confirmation, but I only get <u>Selection not possible</u> message. Is there any functional configuration missing? Any SAP Note?
Steps:
- Enter LM03;
- Check Source Information
- Select Source Information
- Check Destination Information
- Choose <u>F7 NBin</u> (new bin)
- Message <u>Selection not possible</u>
*<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/33/607d5c087b11d3b4ac006094b9b121/frameset.htm">Putaway: Selected by Transfer Order</a>
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Raphael
Dear Gurus,
I have a following requirement by the client, I just wants to confirm is it possible in SAP LE or SD module.
1. In shipment document only those vehicles are shown in the system which assign to materials, like vehicle TTB-123 only bring condensate and crude oil.
2. after assigning vehicle only those driver are shown which assign to those vehicles. like vehicle TTB-123 can use by driver Mr. John and Mr. Valve.
Or there is any alternate solution for this.
Looking for the gurus feedback.
regards,
Imran Khan
Hi All,
I wanted to test my functionality of WM RF process. I do not have a RF Device with me for further testing.
Do we have any screen emulator for Warehouse management module. However, I can find screen emulator available with Extended Warehouse Management (EWM). Please let me know if we have the same with WM since i do not have EWM in my SAP Menu.
Hello, Is there a way I can insert text in the 'Additional Number' field of transfer order header? I am planing to create a transfer order w.r.t. to a TR which is automatically generated at the time of goods receipt against purchase/production order. I tried inserting text in FM L_TO_CREATE_TR in LTAK-LZNUM but it doesn't populate in the TO. I know this field can be populated during TR creation and it gets carried forward to the TO. But is there any way to insert it in the transfer order if the TR was already generated without the additional number? Thanks in advance.
Hello SAP Experts,
I'm able to issue (261 Movement type) material even though stock is not available at bin level.
E.g. User did PGI for 400 PC. But at WM level even though only 200 PC of stock was available. So this generated negative stock for 200 PC.
As checked, Allow negative stock check box is also not allowed at storage type level. Please let us know that how to apply restriction.
Regards,
Pranav
Hi Experts,
I have got replenishment (Mvt. type 319) transfer requirements created via LP21 and I am using RLAUTA10 program in background to convert TR's into TO's. This is working fine except for the case where available stock qty. is less than TR qty. and system gives me an error 'No Source storage bin found'. I want system to create a TO with available quantity and leave TR open with remaining. I can get away with this if I create TO in foreground but that's not the requirement.
I have checked the forum and below link explains this and my settings are also identical but still i can't convert partial quantities. can someone please help?
WM create TO from TRReplenishment
This is how i have set it up.
Hi All,
When trying to create a Handling Unit Physical Inventory document,we go to HUINV01 -Enter Plant & Storage Location-Execute-Find the available records for which the docs can be created.
My question is how can I create these records for which further HU Inventory documents can be created?
Thanks in Advance
Adhi
Hi,
We are using classic Kanban where the source is a WM-HU managed storage location.
This is working fine in 80 - 85 % of the cases, but is not working as desired for materials that have alternating sizes of packaging.
The request of the logistics department is namely to always deliver full pallets or boxes.
Example:
Material A has a Kanban replenishment quantity of 200 PC.
In stock we have 3 pallets, removal strategy = FIFO.
Pallet X 180 PC GR date 01/02/2016
Pallet Y 210 PC GR date 01/04/2016
Pallet Z 220 PC GR date 01/03/2016
Replenishment of first container: no problem, you confirm only TO for 180 PC.
Replenishment of 2nd container: since quantity of pallet Z = 220 exceeds the replenishment quantity = 180, the TO cannot be confirmed for the full pallet.This will work only if you activate overdelivery in the storage type, but this is not a feasible solution for us unless we could limit this on material level. Reason is that for some of the materials the pallets contain several boxes for which the replenishment quantity is set to the box quantity.
Allowing overdelivery would result in a big risk that full pallets will be confirmed instead of boxes.
The alternative of working with nested HUs is not an option as it is considered as too time consuming during inventory.
We considered partial pallet quantity and large / small quantities removal strategies, but both does not seem to meet our requirement.
Furthermore we tried to find a way to force the quantity of the TR created by emptying the Kanban container to be equal to the quantity of the next pallet for replenishment. Unfortunately we couldn't find any BAPI, user exit or FM that serves our purpose or that intervene at the right time.
All ideas will be highly appreciated!
Best regards
Geert
HI Gurus,
I am tryinf to do LM50 - RF Inventory Counting. But system is giving error " User is not assigned to any Active Inventory Document" any advise will be very helpful.
Jessica
Hi All,
There are 2 locations. Location A contains M,N,O storage types & location B contains P,Q,R storage types. The requirement is to split TO based on location A & B.
We can split the TO based on storage types as per standard configuration but is there a way to split TO based on locations as given above by standard configuration without going for an enhancement.
Thanks.
Hi all.
This is very strange and I am really struggling to sort It out.
A WM PI doc has been created via LX16 and the count added. We have mixed stock within the bin and at the time of counting, addition stock was found and so added. The net result was 2 quants (Mat A and Mat B) with no differences and an additional qty (Mat C) added. A recount was initiated and the stocks recounted and the same qty's recorded. LI21 was then executed and the PI doc status is now showing as 'cleared'. Now when we run LI21, there is nothing showing to be cleared in IM and the additional stock as not yet been written on to the system.
I have looked in LINV and the two quants with no diffs are showing as L-Cleared yet the additional stock line is only showing as Z-Counted.
We have already activated OSS 824904 but it isn't helping in this incident.
Operationally we need to either progress the PI doc through to conclusion and create a new one or somehow, delete the existing one and start again, neither of which I can find a way of doing 
.
Cheers
Hello,
I am currently bumping into a situation where the Dynamic Cycle Counting is supposed to enable clearing in the background providing there is no difference in count. If there is an open transfer order, LI20 and LI21 will not process anything as the inventory is not activated. If a count has been done, and the transfer order is confirmed or deleted, it sets the quantity to zero (regardless of the quantity for the TO) and checks the zero block for the current count.
Can you please tell me if there is any transaction to clear these in the background, providing there is no change in quantity?
Thank you,
A
After assigning batch to process order, when we want to goods reciept by movement type 101 in MIGO, "date of manufacture" field changes automatically with posting date. So the date of manufacture is changed after batch is created at GR time.
Maybe it is because of automatic batch creation in MIGO, when the batch was not created before, and the system creates the batch and fill date of manufacture field with posting date.
We need to this field copied from date of manufacture field in MSC1N.