I have maintained below data in movement type table. But don't know why I am not able to create TR on GR of the purchase order.
I have one purchase order where TR is created without any issue.
↧
TR not created on GR
↧
TO Confirmation
Hi Gurus ,
We are working with shelf life expiration date for which we maintain the Minimum remaining shelf life in material master .
Is that possible to get the error/warning message VL451 (The minimum remaining shelf life was fallen short of by & days ) at the time of
TO confirmation for all goods movement in WM .
Please be updated that we already activated the shelf life expiration at warehouse level .
Please let me know if we are missing any setting/configuration
at WM level to get the shelf life checked at all the WM
processes .
Thanks,
Regards,
Anupam
↧
↧
Split Batch Issue With WM Multiple Picks
Hi,
I have an issue relating to deliveries in a WM environment and batch splitting.
In a delivery we can have a line item that is batch managed. The picking for this line item can consist of mutiple transfer orders (for picking pallet by pallet). The issue I have is that the multiple transfer orders are confirmed at different times, and even if for the same batch we end up with multiple batch splits.
For example
Material 999999 Delivery Qty 900
Three transfer orders are raised for 300 each, all three have for batch X.
Once these transfer orders have been confirmed the delivery batch split shows three lines
900001 300 batch X
900002 300 batch X
900003 300 batch X
I would like the batch split to appear only if two different batches are picked.
If for example I have an order of
Material 999999 Delivery Qty 300
One transfer order of 300, batch X
Once this transfer order is confirmed I will have no batch split line - this is what I want.
Appreciate any advice, I am struggling to find the root cause of this issue.
Thanks
Colin
↧
LP10 material staging for production order for a 311
Dear all
I need to do an automatical 311 from the storage location L010 to the storage location P040 from LP10 (WM material staging for production order)
I need one TR 311 for L010 and one TR 312 for P040.
The system is creating only one TR A Stock Removal 311 for the storage location L010
I need the TR 312 E Putaway for the storage location P040.
I have created LPK1 control cycle as follows:
On OMK0:
. Production Supply Area PK05
. Replenishment Movement Type
. Control Material Staging
. Production View PP-PI
. Whse Management View – Whse Number
. Whse Management View – Stor. Typ
Interfaces - Inventory Management - Define Storage Location Control - Stor. Location Control In Warehouse Mgmt
or
I need the TR 312 E Putaway for the storage location P040. Anyone know what is missing?
Cheers
↧
Customer specific shipping labels
Hi All,
I am dealing with automotive client that ships to automotive customers and each customers have their own specific shipping labels for boxes (3S) and pallets (4S). Our challenge is we have close to 200 customer specific labels to be developed in SAP and this is putting the risk to development timelines. We are currently putting an effort to harmonize the labels and go back to customers that are less critical to move to standard shipping labels.
I want to understand if you have come across similar requirement and if yes, how it was handled.
Thanks.
Naren
↧
↧
Possible reason for Open PCN
Dear experts,
we have problems that our WM found stock was stuck in the interim storage tyep 922 when QC release the material.(mvtype 321)
this is a full batch release which means all quant under this batch will be released and change status from Q to U.
we also set the immediate TO creation indicator in our configuration.
However, we success in release one batch and for another batch of the same material, the stock stuck in interim storage type 922.
we checkted ralated PCN and found the PCN status is blank which means its open and no TO is created accordingly.
could you please help to provide possible cause of this issue? why only some of the batch can't create TO?
I have a screenshot attached. its the WM view from MMBE, you could see from the screenshot that batch X0084 is not released sccussefully but another batch X0086 works fine.
another question is could you please suggest which solution is better?
1. we cancle the release and reprocess the release again?
2. we create 2TOs manually and close the PCN by setting the status to "U"
thanks for your help in advance
Regards
↧
2 Step Picking WM.
We are planning to use two step picking but have below queries.
If I have 2 outbound deliveries in which I need XYZ material for 1st delivery 10 qty & for 2nd deliver 5 qty.
But I have only 8 qty available & want to allocate for 1st delivery 3 qty & for 2n delivery 5 qty. How can I do this in LX39
As while allocation it creates TO and don't ask as to how I want to allocate it.
Thanks,
Kiran
↧
Transportation: Planning stages for deliveries with different ship-tos
Hi,
I was wondering what would be the best way to update or change what happens with our stages when the planning button is hit in the shipment (VT02N). The same shipping point is used in all deliveries.
Currently, if I put 3 dleiveries with 3 difefrent ship-tos into a shipment and use the planning button, it will stage it like a milk run.
i.e.
The first stage will be from shipping point to first ship-to with all 3 dleiveries
The second stage will be from ship-to 1 to ship-to 2 and excluses the delivery belonging to the first ship-to
The final stage will be from ship-to 2 to shipt- 3 and will only have the final delivery.
In some cases this is wanted but some of our plants want the stages to explode so every stage contains one delivery and goes from shipping point to the ship-to of said delivery.
They can manully update the stages to do this but I want a more automatic way. Can this be done with config alone or do I need to consider adding code against the planning button via a status profile?
Thanks in advance!
↧
WM bin to bin transfer considering serial number
Hello again WM gurus,
Do you know which movement number I could use to move a material with serial number? My scenario is to move a material bin to bin, I could use LT10, LT01 with movement 999, but it doesn't ask me a material serial number as a movement 261 (trx MB1A) for example.
I've tried to use 999 in MB1A, but it is not possible. Please let me know if you know anything about it. I know it is possible moving from st. loc to st. loc., but I don't know internally in the same St Loc.
Thanks again
↧
↧
LM50 only accepts count in WM unit of measure
We are trying to promote the use of RF transactions for warehouse inventory counts, and are finding that transaction LM50 will only accept the count in the WM unit of measure. As a matter of practice, we use the PAL unit of measure in our warehouses and enter a conversion from base unit of measure to PAL in the alternate units of measure on the material master. This is forcing us to enter the count in PAL when we want to enter in base unit of measure (usually EA). We also find that transaction LI11N has no problem accepting the count in the base unit of measure. Has anybody else encountered this issue, and can you recommend a solution?
Thank you.
Bob Bucy
↧
HUs missing from VL33N after partial GR
Hi All,
When I create an inbound delivery with multiple HUs, and then do a partial GR on the delivery, subsequent VL33N only shows those HUs that haven't been received -- missing from display are the HUs that were received. Is this normal/standard SAP, or do I have an issue?
Thanks,
Dennis
↧
Addition to Existing Stock
Dear all，
i have a question about putaway in wm "addition to existing stock ",
now when i putaway, i use addition to existing stock , if there is not existing stock in my wharehouse,it will suggest an empty bin. but i dont want to it suggest the empty bin, i hope that" it will suggest an existing stock, if there is no, i want to input an bin (donot want to system suggest an empty bin), how to do?
↧
Determining GI st.loc for packing material in a HU
Hi,
Can anyone guide me with the options available to populate the GI st.loc for packing material in a HU.
In our system it's always blank.
Please refer above screen which talks about the issue
BR
Raghava
↧
↧
Putaway Strategy = P (Storage Unit type) and mixed storage = A (Several SU) is not working
Hi Gurus
For put away strategy P and mixed storage A system allows to place different materials or different batch in the same bin. For this strategy we define the storage bin sections A or B. Then assign those sections to the combination of storage type, storage bin type and storage unit type.
We cannot change strategy because we need the system propose a specific SU during the removal process.
Kindly help on how to proceed with this bug.
The situation is similar to scenery showed in threat WM putaway strategy & mixed storage but it´s locked without final solution.
Thanks in advance
Regards
.
↧
problem in creation of control cycle for WM.
When I am trying to create control cycle for WM I am getting message that control cyle is already exist.
Control cycle CXBY68989 0301 LTK213 already exists
Message No. PK009
so when I am trying to display control cycle with LPK3 I am getting message that
The PP control cycle cannot be changed in this transaction
Message No. PK492
Why I am getting this error when I want to maintain control cycle. for WM ?
↧
Negative Quantity Error with VLMOVE
Hello,
Using VLMOVE we are trying to move a Handling Unit (311–Transfer between plants) from a HU managed Sloc. But we get an error message Negative Stock : 15.000 material: XXXXX on HU XXXXXXXXX. SAP Message No. L9604
There is enough stock for this material.
Prior to posting this thread, I searched this forum for this error message and found some advice regarding implementation of SAP notes. In my system, the correction instruction from Note 366810 are already applied
Any lead in this regard will be very helpful.
Thanks,
Anuj Bhagawati
↧
Quant characterstics during picking
Hi Experts,
I created one delivery from four sales orders. all sales order has same material with same quantity. So when I created delivery it is created with 4 line items.
Now when I created a transfer order. Due to insufficient stock, neagative quant is created.
But for this four different neagative quants are created with same quantity each.
So my question here , is it because of 4 sales order, 4 quants created? Is there any specific setting for this?
Regards,
Swapnil
↧
↧
LE Books
Hi
I am an SD consultant and i have been looking for some reading material (Full Books) on some of the sub modules of LE Like Shipping, Transpotation and WM. I have checked the net but i could not be sure about the books that i came across as i would want the book to take me through like an implementation guide does. Can you please suggest me some books which i can refer to from an implementation point of view?
Thanks.
SAP LIght.
↧
Segregation of 2-step picking items to non 2-step items
Hi All,
I've been trying to run a simulation to process picking of items with 2-step picking and the other is not in one Outbound Delivery. The data I am using was already defined and extended in article master. But I can't get through with my testing. When I create a grouping for the 2-step items in VL06P, items not relevant in 2-step picking includes. In LT0E, they are all dispalyed as 2-step relevant. Just to segregate them, I need to execute LT72 to determine 2-step relevance. What I expect is when I create a grouping, the 2-step relevance should be included only on the Group. And to process the items that is not 2-step, I can just click "Create TO in Foreground" or LT03.
Hoping for soonest response.
Thank You,
Mark
↧
Cross Docking Node is not visible/activated in SPRO
Hi,
Cross docking node is not visible/activated in SPRO.
We need to activate the same.
Please guide me with the Steps/Prerequisites and other details in order to activate it.
SAP version is EHP6 FOR SAP ERP 6.0.
Thank You.
↧